WRITTEN
TESTIMONY OF
TIMOTHY
R.E. KEENEY
DEPUTY
ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR
OCEANS
AND ATMOSPHERE
NATIONAL
OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
BEFORE
THE
SUBCOMMITTEE
ON FISHERIES CONSERVATION, WILDLIFE AND OCEANS
COMMITTEE
ON RESOURCES
U.S.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September
30, 2004
Good morning, Chairman Gilchrest and Members of the Subcommittee. I am Timothy Keeney, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA). I appreciate the
opportunity to present NOAA=s perspective on the Weather and Oceans
Resources Realignment Act, H.R. 4368.
H.R. 4368 proposes to transfer both the administration and functions of
NOAA, in their entirety, to the Department of the Interior, where NOAA would
be, Amaintained as a distinct entity.@ No
time line is provided for the transfer.
I would like to preface my remarks by thanking the bill=s author, Representative Jim Saxton, for his
dedication to conserving America=s precious ocean resources. For the last twenty years, he has worked
tirelessly and effectively for his constituents, and he has also been a
supporter of NOAA while serving with distinction as both the Chairman, Vice
Chairman and as Member of this Subcommittee.
In commenting on this legislation, I wanted to focus on two issues: First, has NOAA performed its mission
successfully as part of the Department of Commerce and through cooperation with
other Executive Branch agencies, and have the American people benefited from
NOAA being housed in the Department of Commerce? Second, what are the anticipated costs of
moving NOAA to the Department of the Interior?
NOAA AS AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
On October 3, 2005, NOAA will celebrate its 35th anniversary
as part of the Department of Commerce.
In a July 1970 statement to Congress, President Nixon proposed creating
NOAA to serve a national need "...for better protection of life and
property from natural hazards...for a better understanding of the total
environment...[and] for exploration and development leading to the intelligent
use of our marine resources..."
By every objective measure, NOAA has met or exceeded these
expectations. As events of the past
month have shown, the United States is the most severe-weather prone country on
Earth. Approximately 90 percent of all
Presidentially-declared disasters are weather related. The modernization of the National Weather
Service and dedication of our employees has resulted in the average warning
lead time for tornadoes increasing to 13 minutes from less than two minutes
when NOAA was created.
When President Bush visited the National Hurricane Center in Miami
earlier this month he personally thanked our employees for the accuracy of
their forecasts and warnings which helped to save lives and property when
Hurricanes Charley and Frances swept through the southeastern US and the
Caribbean. This success was truly a
NOAA-wide effort, with virtually every line office in NOAA contributing in some
way to the more accurate forecasts.
We also point with pride to NOAA=s response to the increasing migration of the
US population to our coasts. Currently, more than half our population,
approximately 141 million people, resides within 50 miles of the coasts and
Great Lakes. New programs have been
created to manage this historical migration to the coasts, such as the Coastal
Zone Management program, which now encompasses virtually every coastal and
Great Lakes state.
It should be stressed that during the time-frame being referenced, NOAA
has been an integral part of the Department of Commerce. Due to its strategic impact on the economic
and environmental welfare of the Nation, NOAA commands a central place within
the Department of Commerce. As Secretary
Evans noted when he announced the transmittal of the Administration=s proposed NOAA organic act to Congress,
NOAA's products and services touch 30 percent of the Nation's GDP and supports
jobs for more than 13 million citizens.
The commercial fishing industry adds approximately $28.5 billion, and
marine recreational fishing activities add approximately $25 billion to the
national economy on a yearly basis. In fact, important economic decisions are
made every day based upon science and services that NOAA provides, including
weather and climate forecasting, sustainable fisheries, coastal zone
management, and navigational safety.
With NOAA as an integral element of this agency, the Commerce Department
is the only Federal department that integrates economics, technology, trade,
and the environment as part of a formula to expand the economy; it is a synergy
that exists nowhere else.
Let me provide a few examples:
-- The Economic Development Administration (EDA) and NOAA have
collaborated closely in the development and implementation of the NOAA-led
Portfields Initiative. As sister
Commerce agencies, EDA and NOAA have been close collaborators on brownfields
redevelopment, coastal development, and marine transportation system
development issues; which come together nicely within the Portfields
framework. The Portfields Initiative, a
spin-off from the larger Brownfields Interagency Working Group (IWG), is a
federal interagency project that will focus on the redevelopment and reuse of
brownfields in or around ports, harbors, and marine transportation hubs with
emphasis on development of environmentally sound port facilities.
-- The economic value of the commercial fishing industry is $28.5 billion
annually. In 2002, the seafood
processing and wholesale sectors alone employed 72,000 people. NOAA is working with the Economic Development
Administration (EDA) to provide economic assistance to fishermen and fishing
communities that have been affected by NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service
fisheries restrictions.
-- The value of the marine recreational fishing industry is approximately
$25 billion annually. NOAA aims to
protect the value of fish stocks to the economy by promoting healthy marine
recreational fisheries.
-- Last month, NOAA Fisheries released a draft of an options paper for
the economically distressed U.S. shrimp industry. The paper provides guidance to shrimpers on
how to remain competitive. Within the
Department of Commerce, the International Trade Administration provided input
in order to ensure that the paper accurately reflected the current global
commercial shrimp market.
-- Aquaculture is the world's most rapidly growing sector of food
production. Within the Department of Commerce, NOAA and NIST are both working
to develop technology could help restore depleted salmon species, manage many
wild fish stocks, and benefit the growing world aquaculture industry. By the year 2010, it is estimated that nearly
1 billion hatchery fish will need to be processed worldwide. Current vaccination
practices in hatcheries are not fully reliable and add stress to the young
fish. The NIST Advanced Technology Program is funding a three year project for
$2 million for the development of a faster, cheaper, and more reliable mobile
vaccination technology to vaccinate up to 2 fish per minute in a hatchery with
traceable tags. This research could greatly enhance NOAA's vision for
sustainable aquaculture for food production and stock enhancement.
-- Waterborne cargo contributes more than $742 billion to Gross Domestic
Product and sustains more than 13 million jobs.
Promoting safe navigation is a critical contribution of NOAA to the
nation=s economy.
Ninety-five percent of all goods in US foreign trade enter and leave
this country by ship. On June 30th,
NOAA announced it would provide operational forecasts for ship traffic in
Galveston Bay, the second largest port in North America. This system provides
mariners, port managers and emergency response teams with present and future
conditions of water levels, currents, temperature and salinity. All of this
results in savings to shippers and the American exporter and consumer.
-- Geomagnetic storms can wreak havoc on our Nation=s electrical grid, commercial aviation, and
telecommunications. In 1997, a solar
storm partially destroyed a communications satellite. NOAA helps provide early
warnings allowing industry to take measures to prepare for these storms. The net economic value to industry of these
forecasts has been estimated at over $350 million over a period of three years,
far in excess of the $100 million cost of the system.
-- The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) works
closely with NOAA in developing hurricane-resistant structures. For example, in 2001, NIST used propeller
blasts from Hercules C-130s turboprop aircraft to subject instrument-laden test
homes to sustained wind levels comparable to those of a hurricane. The wind
resistance of houses cannot be tested in traditional wind tunnels, which are
too small. Data analysis yielded computer models that can tell home-builders
and manufacturers the actual wind resistance of different types of residential
buildings and materials under realistic wind conditions.
-- Travel and tourism is the nation=s largest employer, and second largest
contributor to the Nation=s Gross Domestic Product, generating $700
billion annually. Beaches are the
largest tourist destination, with coastal states earning 85 percent of all
tourist revenues. Through its National
Marine Sanctuaries; National Estuarine Research Reserves; Coastal Zone Management
activities; coral conservation programs; and partnerships with states to manage
access to coastal areas on a sustainable basis and provide recreational
opportunities, NOAA helps contribute to the vitality of this industry.
-- NOS and the Office of Coast Survey have worked well with the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) on Marine Transportation System issues as co-leads
for Commerce on the Interagency Committee for the Marine Transportation System
(ICMTS). NOS and BIS look forward to
further interagency cooperation in support of marine transportation
improvements for economic, safety and security reasons.
In addition to these examples of cooperation with other agencies within
the Department of Commerce, there are numerous examples of interagency
cooperation between NOAA and the Department of Interior (DOI), which provide
evidence that merging NOAA with Interior is not necessary to ensure effective
cooperation.
Just a few of these examples are:
-- NOAA and DOI, as co-chairs of the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force,
participate in many joint efforts in the area of coral reef conservation,
preservation and restoration. These
include over $2 million annually in state and territory management grants, and
mapping and monitoring of coral reefs.
Also, NOAA works with the National Park Service in siting and supporting
NOAA=s Coral Reef Early Warning Stations in the
U.S. Virgin Islands and elsewhere.
-- NOAA and the National Park Service, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and
the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) cooperate in implementing the South Florida
Ecosystem Restoration, and in supporting the Comprehensive Everglades
Restoration Plan.
-- The Department of Commerce is the co-chair, together with the
Department of Agriculture and the Department of the Interior, of the National
Invasive Species Council. NOAA and the
FWS are co-chairs of the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Among the many cooperative efforts in this
area is the development of new ballast water management technologies.
-- DOI and NOAA are partners in implementing Executive Order 13158 on
Marine Protected Areas. NOAA and the
National Park Service (NPS), the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and the
Minerals Management Service (MMS) are working together on developing an
inventory of Marine Managed Areas, maintaining the MPA Website, and
coordinating with the Marine Protected Areas Federal Advisory Committee charted
under the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
-- NOAA, through the National Marine Fisheries Service, works with DOI on
many protected species and hydropower issues.
The agencies share jurisdiction for the conservation of marine turtles;
FWS focusing on nesting beach conservation activities, and NOAA working on
conservation and recovery of these species in their marine habitats. NOAA provides scientific expertise and
management advice on marine species listed under the Convention on the
International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), which DOI is the lead agency
for the United States government. The
agencies have multiple joint policies and guidelines related to implementation
of the Endangered Species Act. Also,
NOAA and DOI share authority under Section 18 of the Federal Power Act to
prescribe fishways to ensure safe fish passage at non-Federal hydropower
facilities licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
-- NOAA, through the National Weather Service, supports the interagency
fire program efforts by providing targeted weather forecasts to support DOI=s fire pre-suppression and suppression
activities. Also, NWS and the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) cooperate on the Federal Hydrology Infrastructure,
which provides river and flood forecasting.
-- NOAA works closely with and in support of DOI=s Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC),
National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI), and Geospatial One-Stop (GOS)
activities. The benefits of this
cooperation include enhanced access to marine and coastal data utilizing
metadata and the FGDC clearinghouse system and Geospatial One-Stop; increased
quality of marine and coastal geospatial data through standardization and
training; and, improvements in data and systems interoperatbility.
The U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, after three years of studying the
United States government=s ocean policies, how agencies are structured,
and how they function, did not see any need to remove NOAA from the Commerce
Department at this time. In answer to my
second question, the Administration strongly believes that the American people
benefit from the strong integration of economic and environmental issues which
results from NOAA being part of the Commerce Department.
ANTICIPATED COSTS
OF TRANFERRING NOAA TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
It is clear from other major government reorganizations that the cost to
the taxpayers of such moves can be very high.
First, there is the loss of productivity that can be expected with such
a large move of personnel. Second, the
change of corporate culture can adversely affect morale. The University of Virginia, in a study on
Federal Executive Reorganization, found that federal agency reorganizations
result in unforeseen difficulties. The
study noted, Athe practical task of merging a large number
of different programs with their disparate organizational structures, cultures,
and procedures would take time and meant that >true= reorganization of the executive department
would take many years.@
Furthermore, we do not believe that transferring NOAA form one
Department to another would realize any benefit. A transfer that houses NOAA as a distinct
agency within Interior, as it now exists within Commerce, will not provide for
better integration of ocean policy or coordination of ocean and coastal
activities. There are still many other
agencies with significant roles in ocean and coastal policy, and their roles
would not be affected by this legislation.
Conclusion
The statement of introduction for H.R. 4368 highlighted the need to make
improvements in the way we manage marine fisheries and the unique opportunity
provided to us by the release of the report by the U.S. Commission on Ocean
Policy. The Administration shares the
Committee=s dedication to advancing the next generation
of ocean policy. We are firmly committed
to sound management and effective conservation of our ocean and coastal
resources to meet our nation=s environmental, economic, and social goals
and our nation=s legacy of ocean stewardship. Indeed, demonstrating the President=s commitment to NOAA=s mission, President Bush has personally
visited NOAA facilities on several occasions, including our principal offices
in Silver Spring, Maryland.
However, the Administration cannot support the types of changes made in
H.R. 4368 without having been afforded the opportunity to fully review the
final report of the Ocean Commission. We ask you to allow the Administration to
have the 90 days Congress authorized in Public Law 106-256, as amended, to
review the final report and discuss with you and with other critical
stakeholders how best to achieve our common goals. We believe that the Administration and
Congress have a unique opportunity to work together to achieve meaningful
improvements in ocean policy, science, and management. Thank you again for your time. I will be
happy to take any questions from the Committee.